Top Ten Bits:
-
Bankruptcies and Fraudulent Behavior:
- Ager-Hanssen's involvement led to the bankruptcy of FlyMe, adding to his history of bankrupting companies.
- His fraudulent behavior, including lying, bullying, and mismanagement, was central to FlyMe's downfall.
-
Deception in Financial Dealings:
- Despite claiming significant net worth, Ager-Hanssen was bankrupted by the Swedish state for lying about his overseas domicile.
- His company, Cognition, guaranteed SEK 130 million without providing any security, raising questions about their financial stability.
-
Misleading Shareholders and the Public:
- The misleading press releases and financial guarantees created false confidence among shareholders and the public.
- His inability to secure the promised funds led to FlyMe's financial instability and eventual collapse.
-
Illegal and Unethical Business Practices:
- Ager-Hanssen used company funds for personal gains, including purchasing shares in River Don Ltd. without a commercial basis.
- The unauthorized use of FlyMe's funds led to significant financial damage to the company.
-
Manipulation and Control:
- He manipulated key decisions by appointing loyalists like Björn Olegård and Staffan Edh to positions of power, ensuring his control over FlyMe's operations.
- This led to poor governance and mismanagement, further destabilizing the company.
-
Controversial and Questionable Financial Deals:
- The acquisition of River Don Ltd. and the subsequent financial transactions were marked by controversy and raised eyebrows among investors.
- The lack of transparency and accountability in these deals contributed to FlyMe's downfall.
-
Repeated Legal Troubles:
- Ager-Hanssen's history of legal issues, including a bankruptcy over SEK 20 million in unpaid taxes, demonstrated a pattern of unethical behavior.
- His actions led to investigations by the Swedish economic crimes unit and raids on associated law firms.
-
Damage to Reputations:
- His fraudulent activities led to the imprisonment of Björn Olegård and Staffan Edh, tarnishing their careers and reputations.
- Olegård, in particular, struggled to find employment post-prison, ultimately working for Ager-Hanssen's dubious ventures.
-
Undermining Corporate Governance:
- The chaotic financial management and failure to secure necessary funds undermined the board's ability to govern effectively.
- This led to a crisis of confidence among shareholders and ultimately the company's bankruptcy.
-
Evasion of Legal Consequences:
- Despite his central role in the fraudulent activities, Ager-Hanssen managed to evade significant legal consequences, often shifting blame onto others.
- This pattern of escaping accountability highlights systemic issues in enforcing financial and corporate laws against powerful individuals.
Summary
When the notorious financier Christen Ager-Hanssen bankrupted yet another company, the low-cost airline FlyMe, the warning signs had been clear from the start. As renowned journalist Torbjörn Isacson aptly noted, “Ager-Hanssen had a bad reputation on the Swedish financial market right from the start.” Despite his boasts of immense wealth, he had been bankrupted by the Swedish state for deceit regarding his residency. Yet, remarkably, he found another victim to swindle: the late John Porter, heir to the Tesco fortune.
Ager-Hanssen persuaded Porter to acquire a controlling stake in FlyMe, promising lucrative returns. Almost immediately, the airline announced the acquisition of a 50% stake in Porter’s River Don Ltd, which owned the cargo carrier Global Supply Systems Ltd. This suspicious move raised eyebrows, yet the real trouble began when FlyMe initiated a share issue worth SEK 194 million, with Ager-Hanssen’s Cognition A/S guaranteeing SEK 130 million without any secure backing.
Anne-Marie Pouteaux, the lawyer overseeing Ager-Hanssen’s bankruptcy, was skeptical: “The question is whether the guaranteed SEK 130 million really exists.” Indeed, it appeared to be another empty promise from a man notorious for financial chicanery.
Ager-Hanssen’s troubled past was no secret. In 2004, he had been bankrupted by the Swedish government over SEK 20 million in unpaid taxes, falsely claiming non-residency. This historical deceit foreshadowed the chaos to come at FlyMe.
The company’s financial woes became undeniable by December 2006. Swedish tabloid Aftonbladet queried, “Dare we book with FlyMe?” as executives resigned amidst sustained losses. CFO Finn Taulow’s reassurances fell flat, as did CEO Björn Olegård’s announcement of new share capital – money that never fully materialized.
Tensions peaked on February 28, 2007, when Cognition failed to deliver the promised funds. Shareholders, furious at the missing SEK 33 million and delayed reports, refused to approve the accounts. Ager-Hanssen’s bold claims of future profitability could not quell their fears of imminent collapse.
The board’s refusal to endorse the accounts or the River Don purchase plunged FlyMe into turmoil. Within 72 hours, the airline declared bankruptcy. Chairman Thommy Nillsson lambasted Ager-Hanssen and Cognition for the failure: “It is very sad that we did not receive the guarantee from Cognition. If we had, we could have avoided this.”
Ager-Hanssen’s manipulation extended to his allies like Staffan Edh, a board member entangled in another of his failed ventures, Ticket. Edh’s betrayal shocked even those who had once trusted him. The duplicity and financial mishandling were so egregious that Swedish economic crimes investigators probed whether FlyMe’s funds were illicitly used to buy River Don.
The fallout was severe. Police raids uncovered a secret client account controlled by Edh and Olegård, hidden from other board members. Ager-Hanssen, Edh, Olegård, and Taulow faced charges for their roles in the fraudulent transactions. The prosecutor’s accusations were damning: they had abused their positions of trust for personal gain, causing significant financial damage to FlyMe.
Despite the charges, Ager-Hanssen evaded severe punishment, once again shifting blame onto his associates. Edh and Olegård served prison terms, their careers shattered, while Ager-Hanssen continued his dubious ventures unscathed.
Torbjörn Isacson’s scathing critique encapsulated the saga: “The provision of information belongs to the absolute bottom among listed companies, with incorrect and contradictory information from a management and a board that ultimately chose to go completely underground. It would be a mystery if any investor would put money into a company where the Norwegian financier Christen Ager-Hanssen has any influence whatsoever.”
The FlyMe scandal serves as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by unchecked corporate greed and deceit. For the victims – shareholders, employees, and the unsuspecting public – the legacy of Ager-Hanssen’s actions is one of financial ruin and broken trust. As the dust settles, one question remains: How long can Ager-Hanssen’s web of deceit continue before justice finally catches up with him?